Download the Information Technology Policy as PDF
Information Technology (IT) has become a central part of modern life. It has transformed the way that information is shaped, accessed and distributed; making it possible for vastly more information to be in the hands of people who would previously had great difficulty accessing it. Information technologies have both changed the way we communicate with each other and the way we get jobs done. These changes have provided great opportunities for enhancing knowledge and democratic processes, as well as improving resource use and productivity. But new technological innovation has also created problems by reinforcing existing social and political inequalities and in some cases creating new ones. Information technology has also contributed to the increasing commercialisation of our lives and more waste for our environment to contend with.
Open Systems: Systems where the components are available for scrutiny by interested parties, ie the internal operation is not a commercial secret.Open formats: Formats that are described with freely available specifications, defined by an open standard.Ewaste: End of life electronic goods.Common Carriers: An organisation that transports a product or service using its facilities, or those of other carriers, and offers its services to the general public. Generally common carriers are not responsible for what they carry.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_carrier) If we use road freight as an analogy for IT services, the copper wire telecommunications networks are the public roads, wireless networks are private toll roads, and the packets of information on those wires is cargo. The IP (Internet Protocol) is akin to the road rules.Free and Open-Source Software: The modern definition of Free Software has four points. It defines free software by whether or not the recipient has the freedoms to:
Open source describes practices in production and development that promote access to the end product's source materials—typically, their source code. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source_software)
The Green Party envisions a New Zealand in which Information Technology:
The Green Party believes that:
All citizens and groups should be able to access IT in order to:
If sections of the community are excluded from modern information technology, and the competencies associated with it, they will be excluded economically, socially, and politically. Increasingly there is important information which is primarily, if not solely, made available on the Internet. In order to reduce barriers to access, the Green Party will:
Government DatabasesThe Government has extensive databases of publicly owned information that is accessible online. The Government charges fees for access to this information, which creates barriers and limits access.The Green Party will:
The Green Party supports the use of IT in education where it is appropriate. The Green Party would like to see IT in education enhance learners research skills and abilities, provide timely access to knowledge resources, provide innovative styles of learning, assist learners develop literacy, and explore their creativity. We are also aware though that excessive use of computers at school and at home may affect children’s physical and social development, particularly during early childhood and primary education and so the use of IT needs to be balanced in consideration of these concerns. The Green Party will:
The Green Party believes that schools face competitive and financial pressures in providing appropriate technology for learners, and we support the use of open and transparent tender processes where public money is involved. The Green Party will:
The current market in computer software is dominated by a very small group of very large companies and many sectors of the market have been operating as monopolies. One example of this is the reliance on Microsoft Windows and their other offerings, which has led to a situation where key products and de-facto standards are proprietary, and monopolies have been allowed to form, stifling competition, consumer choice, and indigenous growth of the software industry in Aotearoa/New Zealand. As well this has led to the proliferation of un-secure and unreliable applications, software and operating systems. Free Open-Source Software (FOSS) offers a viable alternative to closed-source propriety software such as Microsoft products. The culture of FOSS leads to it being often more reliable and more secure than the closed-source equivalents, because it is easier to verify software is free of spy ware. Utilising FOSS is good for local industry because it will create demand for a local support industry with all the inherent advantages: jobs, local experience applied to the technology, and expertise. There are some higher costs with FOSS, particularly on the support side, especially during the development and crossover phases exist, but these are more than offset by the license savings of using FOSS. Also, the Green Party recognises that FOSS cannot supply all software requirements of all organisations and that the introduction of new software into workplaces needs to be carefully done if it is not to disrupt work practices. In order to address the monopoly situation, security of software services, and high licensing costs that affect accessibility to commercial software, the Green Party will enact a number of policies.The Green Party will:
New Zealanders are renowned for their entrepreneurial spirit and creativity. The Green Party believes that another way of addressing the situation of commercial software monopolies is to unleash New Zealanders potential to develop our own indigenous software to compete with global multi-national organisations. Locally developed software solutions can be more responsive to Aotearoa/New Zealand's own specific needs, provide employment opportunities to those with technical knowledge and creativity. In addition, exporting software is a good business for New Zealand because it is mostly low carbon emitting and does not lead to depleting the our natural resources.In order to facilitate the development of this industry, the taxation and regulatory environments need to be aligned with the needs of software businesses. In addition, the Government as a large purchaser of IT services should support the development of our industry by purchasing locally produced products where possible. See also our Small business policy, Trade and Investment policy and Economics policyThe Green Party supports:
The Green Party is also aware that there is a danger in allowing critical parts of Aotearoa/New Zealand's information infrastructure to be controlled by foreign controlled corporations with divided loyalties. One example is the social security system and court records, which are controlled by an American owned company. This company has an obligation under American law to hand over any personal information that American intelligence services deem necessary to combat terrorism. There is a potential for New Zealand and American law to come into conflict and create a security issue for New Zealanders. To avoid this situation, the Green Party will:
IT makes the storage and correlation of personal data much more prevalent than it has been in the past. The nature of the technology means that it is easy to gather and use information of all sorts, including accurate and inaccurate information. Once information is placed in a database it can last there indefinitely. The Green Party believes that this information needs to collected, stored, and treated ethically, and that access to this information by New Zealanders is paramount.The Green Party will:
New information technologies have reshaped the way individuals, society, and businesses experience the constraints of time and space. Not long ago the design, production, and distribution of a product were mainly limited to transportation infrastructure constraints. The increasing use of IT has enabled businesses to utilise different workforces at different stages of the production chain more efficiently and flexibly. These changes can improve business’s productivity, but can also affect workers’ rights, health, existing protections and livelihood. In particular, the IT work force is especially susceptible to pressures for efficiency and flexibility. The Green Party is aware that the advent of modern communications policy has made it possible for workers to be available 24 hours a day and 7 days a week around the world. There is known, and possibly unknown, health issues associated with IT use. Also rapid changes in technology can make IT workers’ skills obsolete. The Green Party will:
>
Rapid technological advances and commercial and competitive pressures to consume IT products has led to a growth in the problem of E-waste. Hazardous materials in many IT products include chemicals known to harm humans and other animals and their environment. These include lead, cadmium, and mercury and brominated flame retardants. These chemicals are both dangerous to handle and can contaminate landfills. Government and industry have not collected information on how much E-Waste Is generated by New Zealanders. While there is some informal infrastructure in New Zealand to handle E-Waste, we do not have an official strategy to deal with this issue and the public are mostly unaware of the issues and solutions generated by the problem of E-Waste. In the current informal situation, there is no guarantee the E-Waste will be recycled locally under safe conditions and it is not easy or necessarily safe for the public to start recycling E-Waste. The Green Party believes that it is important that E-Waste is treated as a complete life cycle issue, not just as a disposal problem. The design, manufacture and use of IT products need to include the ability to recycle products and reduce the hazardous materials used as well as reduce other waste connected to the product's life (e.g. consumables such as toner) and energy use. Our current voluntary system of dealing with product life cycles is not widespread across the IT industry and usually linked only to recycling specific IT products. The Green Party believes that the IT industry needs to take responsibility for this issue through a combination of incentives, regulation, and consumer pressure.Another issue facing the production and consumption of IT products and services In Aotearoa/New Zealand is the lack of energy efficiency of many IT products. Overseas studies have shown that the standby facility on many IT products contribute a small, but consistent, amount of total energy use that is unnecessary and inefficient when we need to reduce our energy use.In order to address these issues, the Green Party will:
IT Risk The Green Party acknowledges that there are safety issues relating to inadequate oversight of IT in the control infrastructure of airplanes, cars, trains and other transportation means. When public safety, or the public interest, depends on computer systems, computer systems should be open to public scrutiny and be open systems. In order to ensure that human safety and the safety of crucial democratic processes such as voting in elections is not jeopardised by computer failure, the Green Party will:
IT Security While inadequate technology can be bad for security there are no absolute technological fixes for security issues. An acceptable level of IT security will require the government, the IT industry, and IT users to work cooperatively on security Issues and in developing solutions.The Green Party believes that the Government has a role in maintaining IT security through regulation and education, principally because of the implications for national security and the critical infrastructure that depends on IT, from emergency services control to the EFT-POS system. The IT industry has a role in protecting IT users’ right to privacy and security. Vendors of IT equipment have a duty to ensure that users are aware of the level of security they can expect and to inform them if this changes, because secrecy surrounding security weaknesses with IT equipment and software is, in general, bad for security. The Green Party will:
Ownership of the InternetLines companies that carry Internet signals and ISPs that deliver them to households, must not play favourites with users accessing their lines and they should remain common carriers. If they have no liability for what packets of data they deliver on their wires they should not be able to give preferential treatment to some packets over others based on commercial considerations.If lines companies and ISPs are able to play favourites, innovation will be suppressed. If there are no favourites on the wires the cost of access is very low. New and innovative Internet services can be started with very little capital. To have to pay telecommunications companies to pass packets would vastly increase the costs of new and innovative Internet services.The Internet is a crucial piece of public infrastructure. The design of IP (Internet Protocol, the communication standard/technique that the Internet is built on) means that the Internet can be very reliable and fault tolerant. However, network hardware is not so reliable (e.g. due to power-cuts). Therefore the organisations that supply the networks should supply redundant networks at cost, for use during outages or overloads. This means we need to regulate so that best practice redundancy is implemented.The goal of local peering is twofold. Firstly to improve security of communications infrastructure in a natural disaster etc. and secondly to ensure improved latency (connections on the way)The Green Party will:
Digital Rights and Internet Content Management New Information Technologies and the digital revolution have provided opportunities for information (material and images) to circulate more freely and at greater speed within and across communication technologies. The ease and flexibility of Internet communication combined with the widespread use of standardised (formal or defacto) formats for information interchange creates new and challenging issues. Including managing rights (such as copyright and freedom of access to information) and addressing the issue of industry and state responsibility for providing access to Internet content.The Green Party considers a number of actors to be key in developing policies and protocols around digital rights and Internet content management. The Government needs to develop copyright law that is responsive to the realities of new IT and digitalisation, with the public interest in information (material and print) flow in mind. The Government has a responsibility to ensure that copyright law is consistent across mediums and to accommodate the different technologies and the unique challenges and circumstances for administering policy in these areas that these differences provide.From the industry side, the Green Party sees the role of ISPs as common carriers and that ISPs should not be made responsible for content that passes through their networks or for material on web sites which they host. The Green Party believes that when society wants to regulate communication of information, then the authors of the material need to be responsible for content, rather than ISPs. IT manufacturers do not have the absolute right to enforce copyright protection via technological means (e.g. DVD Zoning, CD crippling). Manufacturers should have the right to introduce 'Meta Information' into digital works for the purposes of identifying those works. The Green Party will ensure: