Even the lawyers say stock numbers should come down

Legal advice that says Hawke’s Bay farmers might have to reduce stock numbers in order to mitigate pollution to waterways, will have implications for water allocation all over New Zealand, the Green Party said today.

Earlier this year, a Board of Inquiry ruled that the proposed $80million Ruataniwha Dam in Hawke’s Bay can only go ahead if farmers taking water from the scheme keep the amount of nitrogen from their farms entering waterways below certain limits.

Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (HBRC) sought advice from law firm Simpson Grierson on whether farmers could be exempt from that limit if their farms take a best practice approach.

“HBRC are desperate for this dam to go through no matter what,” said Green Party water spokesperson Catherine Delahunty.

“HBRC have tried to wriggle out of the conditions the Board decided on by getting this advice.

“However, it has backfired, and the lawyers have said that even best practice methods do not let farmers away with high nitrogen outputs, and they will have to reduce stock numbers.

“This advice has implications for other water storage schemes in the works around the country. Every one of them needs to take the environment into account, and not let commercial interests outweigh protection of our water quality.

“Many parts of the Tukituki catchment are all already at the limit of what the environment can handle.

“But HBRC appears determined to see the Ruataniwha dam go ahead no matter what damage it does to water quality.

“New Zealanders want rivers they can swim in, not rivers that are degraded by algal blooms, infested with weeds, or pose a health risk, which is what happens when too much nitrogen and other pollutants from agriculture enter the water.

“Reducing stock numbers is a sensible approach, as it’s the volume of waste from animals that degrades water quality. Fewer animals means less waste, which means less pollution in the long run,” Ms Delahunty said.

ENDS

 

Latest Environment Announcements

Story

Scrapping Significant Natural Areas shows significant neglect

The Government adding Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) to its already roaring environmental policy bonfire is an assault on the future of wildlife ...
Read More

Story

Say hello to NZ’s most anti-environment government in decades

The Government is giving big industry a free pass to bulldoze New Zealand’s precious native wildlife. 
Read More

Story

Govt trashing nature for its industry mates

The Government’s repeal of the Natural and Built Environment Act is rushed, ideologically motivated, and will be hugely damaging to the health of o...
Read More

Story

Green Party calls for stronger action by Auckland Council to protect urban trees and native forest

The Green Party is calling on Auckland Council to do more to protect urban trees and housing developer Aedifice Property Group to restore and repla...
Read More

Story

You *wood* not believe it: Greens secure win for urban trees

The Green Party’s advocacy has secured an amendment to the Natural and Built Environment Bill at a crucial stage of the Parliamentary process to en...
Read More

Story

Forestry sector must compensate for slash damage

The Green Party welcomes today’s release of the report of the Ministerial Inquiry into slash and sediment, and are clear that the forestry industry...
Read More